|
Heres looking at you, kid... If going through things I like, books, old movie stars and design would probably come up pretty high, which could explain why last nights trip to the Taschen site made me want to salivate at the prospect of some coming books...
...five movie icons books that are coming soon. They've picked great people for these ones, I was thumbing through the Orson Welles one in Baltic a few weeks ago and they're everything you'd expect, a few hundred pages of high quality, well layed out images interspersed with just enough text to make it flow right. I love the Icons books and would probably pre-order all five of these were it possible to pay now instead of having them take money on some random day that I don't know when.. |
|
|
1.3.07 12:07 |
|
In Points...
|
|
|
1.3.07 17:27 |
|
|
deletions... ... sorry about all the attempted and deleted posts today (yes, all three of them!) I want to blog, but I can't manage it, due to also wanting to rip out my own hair with work, which is increasingly like Chinese water torture, only without the benefits of cleansing the pores. Maybe tomorrow. |
|
|
5.3.07 15:04 |
|
|
The charge... Dear Bob Shrum, First of all may I offer belated condolences on your candidates failure to achieve there goals in the last two elections, I'm sure this is no slight on your abilities as an adviser, after all, who would have foreseen hanging chads or swift boats? At any rate, I'm not writing to you about politics, but instead about your an analogy you're quoted as having used in last week's Sunday Times. While I am all for the use of analogies that reference British History, I did find it somewhat odd that you should be using them too, after all, your particular former colony has a whopping two centuries of history now, perhaps you could have found some analogies of your own. This is, however, by the by, my problem is with your analogy itself, in that it's incorrect. ![]() The Charge of the Light Brigade - Not actually all that bad! You suggest that the charge of the light brigade at the battle of Balaclava was not successful, from your phrasing of the analogy, I'd even go so far as to say you suggest it was a failure. On the contrary, my dear boy, the charge of the Light Brigade was spectacular not only in the fearless courage shown by the combatants, but also in the fact that the objectives of the charge were in fact achieved against all odds. The guns at the far end of the valley were taken and the twenty battalions holding said guns repulsed. Now, due to the unfortunate fact that more than half of the horses and almost a quarter of the men lay dead on the field, the only possible option from this point was to retreat back along the valley, such a position as they had attained being indefencible due to their high casualty figures, however the fact remains that they objective was achieved in the first place. Permit me if I may, to suggest a better analogy, I'm sure we could find one, if we tried. I was at first going to suggest one of the major defeats inflicted upon the British in that era, however at Islandwhana and Khartoum we were attacked, as opposed to attacking, thus rendering them entirely useless for the purpose of your analogy. I considered the Hicks-Pasha column, however, while Hicks himself was British, the column was Egyptian and Soudanese and they were ambushed before any attack was made upon the Mahdi's forces. To make your analogy work we need an all out attack by the forces, on this count Badajoz would come into contention, however again this resulted in success, albeit after many assaults of the most bloody and nightmarish nature. This leaves us with somewhat of a problem in that, as a general rule, when the thin red line attacked, it did so successfully. If I may venture to offer a Naval analogy, perhaps you could consider the battle of Santa Cruz de Tenerife? Not only were the attackers defeated, but their commander lost his arm. Of course, the defeat was in fact a negotiated surrender with full military honours, again it seems to fail you. For an example of an unsuccessful attack, may I suggest you look elsewhere, perhaps at a nation with a less distinguished historical track record. I can think of a few, Napoleon's 1812 jaunt into Russia was rather less than successful, and Hitler didn't fair overly well when he attempted a similar manoeuvre 169 years later. Of course, we must assess also the ability of your audience to be familiar with the business end of your analogy, so perhaps we should look elsewhere, perhaps one may find some examples of failed military aggression a little closer to home, I don't know for certain, but perhaps Vietnam, Korea, Iraq may give some scope for thought. Yours amillionpieces |
|
|
6.3.07 14:48 |
|
|
a correction... Alas, I was wrong, the local rag had not ignored my letter, it was in yesterday's paper. Quite why it takes a five day turn around to print an e-mail regarding an issue that was only ever going to be news for a day or two is beyond me, but mine not to reason why. They even edited the "Sir, I am writing to you with regards to your front page story today" to reflect their inability to publish promptly. Nice, very nice, make it look like I was slow to write it. Anyway, like any true blogger would, I scanned it for internet show and tell. My next letter writing target should perhaps be The Economist. I think I may need to up my game somewhat... ![]() |
|
|
6.3.07 23:38 |
|
|
Where there was doubt... There are some songs that require a bit more than a voice to sing them, they require a background, they require something else, some special ingredient in the performance that takes them beyond mere music. Which is why I was somewhat displeased to see baby faced X-factor loser Ray Quinn is releasing a cover version of My Way. Now, I haven't anything against Ray, I really don't know the boy, and I'm sure he's probably a nice enough chap, but why My Way? Ray Quinn - Does it his way, apparently. Which is why I have a problem with Ray Quinn's version, the irony of a manufactured poppet singing "I did it my way" seems somewhat lost on the music industry as the package up another youngster to try to make a star. What has he done his way, what is all this massive life experience that gives him the passion to pull of a track like this? My way evokes thoughts of someone who has been through the mill and came out standing, not been through a brief spell at drama school and came out deciding to sing. He has a good voice, my problem isn't with a lack of talent, but why this song, amongst so many big band tracks, why My Way? |
|
|
7.3.07 12:37 |
|
|
Lords Reform... "The ayes to the right, 337, the noes to the left 224, the ayes have it." A short sentence, but one that signals perhaps the single biggest constitutional change this country has seen since Cromwell and the execution of Charles I. While the politicians say that they're effecting this change for us, the electorate will get no real say in the matter, it has been decided that the House of Lords should be a fully elected upper chamber. Now, it's easy pickings for those in favour of a fully elected upper house to argue for it, they just make a lot of noise about how undemocratic the Lord's is, how against our principles of democracy the very idea of a House of Lords is, and yet in doing so they fail to fully analyse and consider the effect of what they are suggesting. I agree with their argument that the Lord's is undemocratic, however, the fact is that it stands at present as a check and balance on the Government that we elect, while Blair has proved adept at bullying the Lords and forcing through legislation by abusing The Parliament Act, it is the Lords that has consistently provided the only challenge to his power. ![]() The House of Lords Subject of a number of Commons votes today. This vital check and balance in the constitution stands to be lost completely, if the decision to make a fully elected chamber is implemented then we have another set of Politicians to vote for, and the possibility of having absolutley no way of controlling the power of No. 10. If the upper chamber is elected then it stands to reason that it will be the main parties competing for the power in this chamber, and it will fall into the present system of party politics and whipping. Take for instance the 1997 election, Labour were elected with a huge majority, if the upper chamber was also elected, it stands to reason that at that time they public would have voted similarly, even with only a third of the seats up for grabs, this would tip power, giving the Labour party power in both houses, thus clever use of the whips could have seen that none of the Governments policies met anything in the way of real opposition. The Lords at present is not ideal, it's imperfect in that people can still be born with the right to sit there, it's imperfect in the fact that the prime minister can appoint people to sit there, for his own motives and reasons. However, the fact is that it does play a role in limiting and restricting the power of the commons. While the Lords is flawed, therefore, it is not a worthless institution, however a fully elected second chamber could very soon take the form of just an extension of the party political games of the commons, removing any kind of control. The Lord's could do with reform, however rushing into an American style system is not right for this country. The danger with cantering into reform is that this system is the way our country is governed and has been for hundreds of years, we can't just go screw it up and then come back to the drawing board. Reform, if neccesary has to be well thought out and considered so that a long lasting solution is found. Any solution needs to be non-partisan, because if it is a partisan house, it will be open to giving absolute power to government. It's difficult to have non partisan elections, and as such an elected upper house may well not be the ideal solution, however if appointing then we need clear rules so that the system can't be abused. For this reason I think we should stick with the status quo at present, however flawed, until a workable and fair solution is found and can be put to the nation in a referendum. |
|
|
7.3.07 19:21 |
|
[next page]
















